|
By Marco Rauland, Ph.D., Head of Pricing & Market Access
There is no question: Conjoint/discrete choice methodologies are the gold standard in pricing/willingness-to-pay research since the presentation of several products with different attributes (where just one is price) most realistically reflects the real-life choice situation. Furthermore, as multi-attribute trade-off exercises do not exclusively focus on price (with the exception of pure brand/price trade-offs), respondents are not aware that the research is primarily designed to establish a price and thus they are not “playing a price game” when conducting the choice tasks.
Nevertheless, there are situations where a conjoint/discrete choice design may not be feasible (budget limitations, time constraints, e.g., for a due-diligence; too complex for a specific target group, e.g., patients). In these instances and, ideally, to flank a multi-attribute trade-off exercise, direct price questioning techniques are used to assess the pricing opportunities of a product.
|